AFA calls for Muslims out of the military

Posted by J.D. On Thursday, November 12, 2009 0 comments
Earlier I wrote of Pat Robertson declaring that we should treat Musilms like Communists and Fascists, but American Family Association is getting in on the ignorant hate, too.

In a blog entry penned by Bryan Fischer, AFA Director of Issues Analysis, the following was stated:

...It is time, I suggest, to stop the practice of allowing Muslims to serve in the U.S. military. The reason is simple: the more devout a Muslim is, the more of a threat he is to national security. Devout Muslims, who accept the teachings of the Prophet as divinely inspired, believe it is their duty to kill infidels. Yesterday's massacre is living proof. And yesterday's incident is not the first fragging incident involving a Muslim taking out his fellow U.S. soldiers.

Of course, most U.S. Muslims don't shoot up their fellow soldiers. Fine. As soon as Muslims give us a foolproof way to identify their jihadis from their moderates, we'll go back to allowing them to serve. You tell us who the ones are that we have to worry about, prove you're right, and Muslims can once again serve. Until that day comes, we simply cannot afford the risk. You invent a jihadi-detector that works every time it's used, and we'll welcome you back with open arms.

This is not Islamophobia, it is Islamo-realism.

And don't give us reassurances about the oaths that Muslim soldiers take to protect and defend the Constitution from all enemies, foreign and domestic. Hasan took that oath, and it proved meaningless. In fact, the more devout a Muslim is, the more likely he is to lie to you through his teeth, since lying to the infidel to advance the cause of Islam is commended, not just permitted, in the Koran.

It's time we all got over the nonsense that all cultures and religions are equally valid or worthy. They most certainly are not. While Christianity is a religion of peace, founded by the Prince of Peace, Islam is a religion of war and violence, founded by a man who routinely chopped the heads off his enemies, had sex with nine-year old girls, and made his wealth plundering merchant caravans....

I guess my retort would be the following:

Hey Mr. Fischer! Remember Timothy McVeigh? Yeah...he was that white terrorist who bombed the Alfred P. Murrah Building in Oklahoma City on April 19, 1995. He was also in the U.S. Army. And he was raised a Christian.

Until you can give me a foolproof way to identify crazy Christian white boys from their moderates, no white Christian dudes should be able to serve. You know...for the safety of everyone else in the military. This isn't WhiteChristianophobia, it is WhiteChristian-realism. when the shoe is on the other foot doesn't it?

The simple truth of the matter is that Nidal Malik Hasan, like Timothy McVeigh, had his own shit going on. He was a damaged man that took his anger out on others via violence. What Hasan did had as much to do with his being Muslim and McVeigh's actions had to do with him being raised Catholic....nothing at all.

One key difference between the two examples? Hasan begged repeatedly to leave the military. This is not the action of an evil jihadist who enlisted to be a sleeper agent. Hasan wanted TO LEAVE THE MILITARY. But they wouldn't release him. And then he snapped.

And that whole "Christianity is a religion of peace" thing? Sure...if we casually ignore Crusades, Inquisitions, pogroms, witch hunts and witch burnings, the actions of people like Scott P. Roeder, etc. don't think it is fair that all Christians should have to take responsibility for Scott Roeder? Then why in the hell should all Muslims have to take responsibility for Nidal Hasan?

Mr. Fischer, I am a Christian. And I don't want to be lumped in with people like Scott Roeder. Or you.

But by all means, Mr. Fischer, continue spewing your ignorant hate. The more you write shit like this, the less likely anyone will bother paying attention.


Post a Comment

Please read out comment policy before posting a comment.